[Nicole]

An article from Hypha, which is an org that sets up DAOs for other orgs. This highlights “10 ways that DAOs differ from traditional organizations”.

https://hypha.earth/daoing-it-differently-10-ways-daos-differ-from-traditional-organizations/

[a0mn.cc]

Imo, DAOs don’t work for everyone/every type of being.

It’s just another way to organize, record, share rewards, compensate etc.

Village tribes also have their own hierarchies or value-system(s), jungle natives have their shamans, etc.

I personally find it somewhat inefficient if there’s too many people involved, can be long-winded (like me, when I’m on a roll??? )… It’s like a dilution of power & expertise if not correctly setup.

A startup would have a different co-ordination to another startup &/or mere community outings based on leisure, recreation, interest. So the DAO rules would be setup differently.

Imo the people who make too much of a big deal about them have (internally felt, might be conscious or not) issues with ‘power balance’… Hence a need to try & experiment with different configurations.

Someone(s) would need to start the DAO. Then it would need maintenance & momentum… Just like with anything else. It just depends who values what & rewards based on the criteria that suits the (initial/future) DAO members.

How’s this different from being a startup co/founder & product-market fit? Idk. 😆🤷

[a0mn.cc]

Also a strongly felt opinon (that no-one asked for but it just obtusely came to mind as ‘somewhat relevant to the topic of DAOs’):

There’s no such thing as ‘flat hierarchy’. Stfu 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤌A hierarchy is a hierarchy of power, value, skill, survival priorities etc.

An organization can have more direct & open lines of communication but WTF is a ‘flat hierarchy’!?!???????!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤷😆🍅🍅🍅